Ok! Bear seems to be hitting it off well with Trix while Alan is still striking out with her entourage. Maybe he’ll do better at the fair? Only time will tell.
Ok! Bear seems to be hitting it off well with Trix while Alan is still striking out with her entourage. Maybe he’ll do better at the fair? Only time will tell.
Alan? Be a perfect gentleman?
Yeah ehm… no xD But I’d really like to know Bears secret 😛
Maybe he can wish for a better personality? lol
I don’t really think Bear has a “secret” really… i’m not totally certain.
There has to be SOMETHING that makes it so darn easy for BEAR of all people to just go court a chick like that lol
Reminds me of a scene in the movie Renaissance Man. The kid from Brooklyn was talking about how everyone in his old neighborhood had smoking hot girls on their arm, even if they were butt-ugly, because that’s how the guys back home carried themselves. Physical attraction can be overridden by certain hard-wired triggers in the female psyche. Confidence and strength are two of those factors. Natural charisma is another factor. And as we all know, initial physical attraction is a factor of our lust: the need in us all to get our groove on. If there’s nothing else there, if that is all you have, then it’s going to be a short honeymoon.
That said, Kevin James and Leah Remini is wish fulfillment on the part of the writers of The King of Queens. XD
Yes and no.
Humans are a weird species since we can, biologically, overrule some of our instincts or ‘hard-wired triggers’ and such.
Some women aren’t interested in men that are confident, have strength (in whatever incarnation of the word is viable in this context) or others of the things that ‘normal’ women are.
Why do you think there are people who (for some absurd) reason prefer say… preteens, animals or their own sex instead of what they ‘should’ by ‘default’ through the ‘hard-wired triggers’ prefer?
It’s a pretty nasty topic to talk about as humans are so… unique in terms of what’s natural, what’s not and what can even be defined as ‘natural’ in regards to our species.
We sideplace ourselves with nature constantly, the best example would be the computer you’re most likely sitting at (for all I know you could be using a phone but a PC is more likely). Would you call it natural? No? What would you then call it? Human made? Bing, if it’s not natural but ‘human made’ then how can humans be natural themselves?
Wow… I’ll just stop now before I go down this track any further, I’ve most likely lost about 97% of all readers by this point, if not in length then in abstract phisophical discussion and thoughts LOL